Welcome

Close

What We Do

Who We Help

Who We Are

Browse by Category

Inpatient Clinical Care

Ambulatory & Post Acute Care

Global

RevenueCycle Financial / HIM

Value Based Care

Security & Privacy

Services & Consulting

Imaging Systems

Payer Solutions

Trending Vendors

Back

Back

2008 Best in KLAS Cardiology

2008 BEST IN KLAS

2008 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services

SOFTWARE

2008 Best in KLAS Awards - Medical Equipment

EQUIPMENT

Who is Best in KLAS?

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software

2024 GLOBAL

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services

2024 BEST IN KLAS

How do Cardiology solutions compare?

Digisonics DigiView

Average for Cardiology73.9

50

Digisonics DigiView

100

2

Emageon HeartSuite VERICIS

Emageon HeartSuite VERICIS

3

PicomEnterprise Cardiology

PicomEnterprise Cardiology

4

Xcelera

Xcelera

5

FUJIFILM ProSolv Cardiovascular

FUJIFILM ProSolv Cardiovascular

6

LUMEDX CardioStar

LUMEDX CardioStar

7

Horizon Cardiology

Horizon Cardiology

8

GE Centricity Cardiology

GE Centricity Cardiology

9

Siemens syngo Dynamics

Siemens syngo Dynamics

10

Agfa IMPAX Cardiovascular

Agfa IMPAX Cardiovascular

Software 0.0

Past Cardiology Awards

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2015/2016

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Cardiology PACS

Related ReportsView All Reports

Cardiology 2022

23 August 22 | Monique Rasband and Sidney Tate

Healthcare organizations have steadily invested in cardiology solutions despite the COVID-19 pandemic, and structured reporting continues to be top of mind in their search for a vendor to unify cardiology modalities and imaging overall. Over 25% of the 183 interviewed organizations are actively planning to replace their current vendor or would do so if given the option, leading to a dynamic, volatile market where no one vendor consistently leads in customer satisfaction. This report (1) examines the breadth of customer-reported structured reporting adoption and customer satisfaction to help organizations determine which vendors can best meet their needs and (2) provides an update on customer satisfaction with hemodynamics solutions. Note: For this report, a respondent organization had to be live with structured reporting in at least one module for their perspective to be included.

Optum/Change Healthcare Merger

16 August 22 | Boyd Stewart and Sam Eaquinto

In January 2021, Optum announced their intentions to acquire Change Healthcare. The merger remains unfinalized, however, as the US Department of Justice blocked the deal in February 2022 due to anticompetition concerns—such a merger would give UnitedHealth Group, Optum’s parent company and the nation’s largest insurer, access to rivals’ sensitive data. The legal proceeding is ongoing and scheduled to go to trial August 1, 2022. This report shares Optum and Change Healthcare customers’ reactions to the merger and their perceptions of its impact. Between March 2021 and April 2022, KLAS interviewed 48 individuals from 46 unique organizations; of these respondents, 9% are Optum customers, 56% are Change Healthcare customers, and 35% are customers of both vendors.

Decision Insights

Cardiology 2021

14 July 21 | Doug Tolley, Monique Rasband and Sam Eaquinto

While enterprise imaging (EI) is on healthcare organizations’ minds, many currently use multiple vendors for different imaging needs. For cardiology in particular, organizations frequently must piece together multiple systems to meet their structured reporting needs. Today, a number of organizations are replacing their legacy cardiology solutions and/or evaluating cardiology in the context of their long-term EI strategy (including structured reporting in the CVIS). No cardiology offering stands out with great customer satisfaction—each of the last three years has seen a different vendor win Best in KLAS for cardiology. This report examines 38 recent cardiology purchase decisions and the factors driving these decisions.