Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

PACS 2022
|
2022
PACS 2020
|
2020
PACS 2018
|
2018
PACS 2017
|
2017
PACS 2015
|
2015
PACS Technology 2013
|
2013
Community and Ambulatory PACS 2012
|
2012
PACS 2011
|
2011
Ambulatory RIS/PACS
|
2011
A Read on PACS
|
2010
The New PACS Market
|
2009
Ambulatory PACS 2008
|
2008
Community Hospital PACS 2008
|
2008
PACS - Acute Care 2008
|
2008
Ambulatory PACS 2007
|
2007
Community Hospital PACS 2007
|
2007
Ambulatory PACS 2006
|
2006
Community PACS 2006
|
2006
PACS - Ambulatory/Imaging Center Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Community Hospital Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Acute Care Large Study 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
Acute Care PACS 2006 Acute Care PACS 2006
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Acute Care PACS 2006

October 25, 2006

The "Acute Care PACS 2006" report provides a snapshot of the acute care PACS vendors and products installed in over 200-bed healthcare facilities and compares their relative strengthes and weaknesses, all PACS vendors, and the KLAS HIT average of all Healthcare Information Technology products in the KLAS Database.

In addition, this report is able to provide an insight into trends in this market using prior year research in the Trending section of this document. A profile of innovative PACS solutions that benefit the patient care, teaching, and research missions of the Univerity of Wisconsin–Madison may be found in the Provider Profile section of today’s report.

Select Findings of Interest

  • Collectively, “Implementation within Budget/Cost” was the most common high scoring indicator. The most common low scoring indicator was “Proactive Service.”
  • With the exception of Sales/Contracting and ROI/Cost categories, the overall 2006 Percentage of Positive Commentary was an improvement over 2005 performance.
  • Vendor scores vary widely on several indicators. For example, “Implementation and Training” positive commentary ranges from 17 percent to 100 percent, depending upon the vendor studied and “Support and Documentation” positive commentary ranges from 33 percent to 78 percent, depending upon the vendor.

Vendors Included in the Study

The "Acute Care PACS 2006" report includes a total of 21 products from 20 vendors. Eleven products that qualify to be in the Main Body of the report, five qualify for the Early Data section, and five products have Vendor Overviews and Technical Assessments only.

Main Body products include Agfa IMPAX, AMICAS Vision Series PACS, DR Systems Dominator, Dynamic Imaging IntegradWeb PACs, Emageon Enterprise Visual PACS, Fuji Synapse, GE Centricity PACS v.2.0, Kodak CareStream PACS, McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging, Philips iSite (Stentor) and Siemens SIENET.

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments