Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

ED Usability 2017
|
2017
EDIS 2013
|
2013
EDIS 2011
|
2011
EDIS 2010 - Functionality vs. Integration
|
2010
Emergency Department Information Systems
|
2009
Emergency Department Systems 2008
|
2008
Emergency Department Report 2006
|
2006

 End chart zoom
EDIS Perception Study 2007 EDIS Perception Study 2007
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

EDIS Perception Study 2007

July 25, 2007

Forty percent of survey participants indicated plans to purchase an EDIS within the next two years – but who’s buying? Are they replacing existing solutions, or are they net new purchasers? Which vendors are they considering, and why? Are there any vendors they would specifically avoid? And what about the ever-looming decision between best of breed and enterprise solutions? KLAS set out to find the answers to these and other questions in this first of its kind Emergency Department Information Systems (EDIS) Perception 2007 study.

Rather than reporting actual vendor performance, KLAS perception studies focus on current provider opinions of vendor offerings, and which products providers would consider if they were to begin the selection process today. The following study findings focus on the top nine vendors that providers would most often consider if given the opportunity to select a vendor today. These vendors are:

  • Allscripts/A4 HealthMatics ED
  • Picis ED PulseCheck
  • Cerner Millennium FirstNet
  • MEDHOST EDMS
  • McKesson Horizon Emergency Care
  • Wellsoft EDIS
  • Meditech C/S EDM
  • T-System T-SystemEV
  • Epic EpicCare ED
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

​