Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

PACS 2022
|
2022
PACS 2020
|
2020
PACS 2018
|
2018
PACS 2017
|
2017
PACS 2015
|
2015
PACS Technology 2013
|
2013
Community and Ambulatory PACS 2012
|
2012
PACS 2011
|
2011
Ambulatory RIS/PACS
|
2011
A Read on PACS
|
2010
The New PACS Market
|
2009
Ambulatory PACS 2008
|
2008
Community Hospital PACS 2008
|
2008
PACS - Acute Care 2008
|
2008
Ambulatory PACS 2007
|
2007
Community Hospital PACS 2007
|
2007
Community PACS 2006
|
2006
Acute Care PACS 2006
|
2006
PACS - Ambulatory/Imaging Center Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Community Hospital Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Acute Care Large Study 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
Ambulatory PACS 2006 Ambulatory PACS 2006
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Ambulatory PACS 2006

November 16, 2006

The 2006 Ambulatory/Imaging Center Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) report looks specifically at PACS in freestanding ambulatory/imaging centers. This is the third year that KLAS has covered Ambulatory/Imaging Center PACS in a report. This research continues to track an information system of significant importance to providers, improving vendor performance scores, convergence of PACS and RIS functions and growth in the number of PACS implementations in radiology and non-radiology diagnostic services and modalities.

Findings of Interest

  • This year’s research reveals that 18 percent of the respondents are replacing their Ambulatory/Imaging Center PACS solutions with the next generation of investment for their facilities.
  • The Total Scores of the 12 Main Body Ambulatory/Imaging Center PACS vendors ranged from 91.9 for Dynamic Imaging to 83.0 for Philips in contrast to that of the Average Ambulatory/Imaging Center PACS Vendor in the KLAS Database with a Total Score of 85.5.
  • Collectively, Implementation within Budget/Cost was the most common high scoring indicator, while the most common low scoring indicator was Quality of Training.

Vendors Included in the Study

Today’s report includes a total of 27 products from 27 vendors. The 12 products that qualify to be in the Main Body of the report include: AMICAS Vision Series PACS, Avreo interWORKS, DR Systems Dominator, Dynamic Imaging IntegradWeb PACs, Fuji Synapse, Intelerad IntelePACS, McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging, NovaRad NovaPACS, Philips iSite (Stentor), RamSoft PowerServer PACS, ScImage PicomEnterprise PACS and Sectra PACS.

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments

​